Outreach to the Veterans Crisis Line During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Methods Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The mental health impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic have been widely felt among already vulnerable populations, such as U.S. military veterans, including a heightened risk for depression and suicidal ideation. Support hotlines such as the Veterans Crisis Line (VCL) took a central role in addressing various concerns from callers in distress; research has yet to examine the concerns of veterans who used the VCL during the early months of the pandemic. METHODS: A mixed-methods analysis of characteristics of veteran outreach to the VCL during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States was conducted on 342,248 calls during April-December 2020; 3.8% (N=12,869) of calls were coded as related to COVID-19. Quantitative examination was conducted regarding COVID-19-related reasons for contact, suicide risk screens, and caller concerns; 360 unique calls with synopsis notes that included a COVID-19 flag were qualitatively analyzed. RESULTS: Quantitative analysis of the calls with a COVID-19 flag revealed mental health concerns, loneliness, and suicidal thoughts as top reasons veterans contacted the VCL during the pandemic. Qualitative analysis identified specific economic and mental health concerns, including negative impacts on income and housing, increased feelings of depression or anxiety, and pandemic-specific concerns such as testing and vaccine availability. Disrupted access to resources for coping, including support groups or gyms, had negative perceived impacts and sometimes exacerbated preexisting problems such as substance abuse or depression. CONCLUSIONS: These findings emphasize the role of VCL as providing general support to veterans experiencing loneliness and supplying assistance in coping with pandemic-related distress.

Gender differences in veterans' use of the Veterans Crisis Line (VCL): Findings from VCL call data.

OBJECTIVE: To compare characteristics of calls to the Veterans Crisis Line (VCL) by caller gender and identify potentially unique needs of women callers. METHOD: Retrospective review of clinical data collected during VCL calls, comparing call characteristics between women and men veteran callers. RESULTS: The data included 116,029 calls by women veterans and 651,239 calls by men veterans between January 1, 2018-December 31, 2019. Timing (hour/day/season) of VCL calls was similar between women and men callers. We observed gender differences in reason for call, with the most salient differences in reasons related to interpersonal violence, including sexual trauma (e.g., military sexual trauma as reason for call - prevalence ratio (PR) for women vs. men = 9.13, 95% CI = 8.83, 9.46). Women callers were also more likely than men callers to screen positive for suicide risk (PR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.26, 1.29), receive a higher suicide risk assessment rating (PR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.02, 1.07), and be referred to a VA Suicide Prevention Coordinator for follow-up (PR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.09, 1.11). CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of VCL call data indicated both similarities and differences across genders in call characteristics, including interpersonal relationships and experiences of abuse and assault as particularly salient factors prompting women veterans' calls to VCL. This study also suggests the presence of increased suicide risk among women versus men veteran VCL callers.

"Stories of starting": Understanding the complex contexts of opioid misuse initiation.

Background: The impacts of opioid use disorder and opioid-involved overdose are known, but less is known about the contexts in which people first misuse opioids, and the motivations for continued misuse. Methods: In-depth interviews with 26 individuals in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania with current or past histories of opioid misuse were conducted. Narratives were analyzed to understand the circumstances and influences contributing to initial and continued misuse of opioids. Results: Participants described social and familial contexts that normalized or accepted opioid misuse-this often included their own use of other illicit substances prior to initiating opioids. Participants also described initial use of opioids as related to efforts to cope with physical pain. They also described recognizing and then seeking psychological/emotional benefits from opioids. All three of these themes often overlapped and intersected in these stories of starting opioid misuse. Conclusions: Opioid misuse stemmed from complex interacting influences involving coping with physical and psychological pain, perception that opioids are needed to feel "normal", and acceptance or normalization of opioid use. This suggests a multi-pronged approach to both prevention and treatment are needed.

The Potential of "Watchful" Care: Preventing Suicide with Aloha in Hawaii.

As a therapeutic practice of care, "watchfulness" (Garcia 2010) implies a vigilant responsibility and constant mindfulness of others; in Hawaii, this is captured in the concept of aloha. This article explains how watchful care with aloha is discussed and mobilized in community suicide prevention in Hawaii. Rates of suicidality and suicide attempts in the state are high, among young people in particular. My ethnographic research follows a network of workers and volunteers as they incorporate local understandings of aloha into suicide prevention outreach. Following a history of aloha's meanings and (mis)uses in and beyond Hawaii, I draw on ethnographic examples to reveal how care with aloha prioritizes personal connection and individuality, rather than being rhetorically detached or "anonymous" (Stevenson 2014). But as my central vignettes reveal, there are difficulties in the implementation of this kind of watchful care, which ultimately question its utility in suicide prevention.